Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SciPost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SciPost

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article de-PRODded by creator without stated reason. PROD reason still stands: "A (minor) grant from MPI is not enough for notability: Non-notable publisher of as yet non-notable scientific journals." Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable. The only source is a non-independent press release that is one sentence long (not counting links at the end). This may become notable, it may not outlast the granting period of the original grants that established it. Time will tell but isn't notable now. Agricolae (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SciPost Physics is also related. --MaoGo (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.