Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schnarr Snake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3, A7, if it's released on their website it's speediable webcontent Mgm|^(talk) 11:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Schnarr Snake

Game by non-notable company that is "currently in development". Somno (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only confirmed tester is "John Queer"? Come on, this seems pretty obvious... It's all nonsense. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 04:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:HOAX, WP:FUTURE, WP:ADVERT, WP:N, WP:V, etc. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This could have been CSD'd in my opinion for notability and/or advert. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't speedily delete a game for notability via A7, and when I nominated the article it had one promotional sentence but IMHO, the article overall didn't meet G11. Somno (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete — Wow. MuZemike (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to speedy delete (G3) as pure vandalism. I am convinced after a basic search that this is complete and utter in-your-face bullshit. MuZemike (talk) 07:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speedily if possible. There isn't a shred of verifiable information here. Zetawoof_(ζ) 10:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.