Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schaefer Ambulance Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant ^talk 17:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schaefer Ambulance Service

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm really not sure this demonstrates sufficient notability. The only source is the company's own site, and I can't find any suitable sources by searching - lots of self-published material and some business-directory type info, but that's about all. It is mentioned at Air ambulance as operating the first air ambulance in the USA, and that's probably a notable fact, but I can't see anything more to be said than what is already in that article. I may be missing something, and American editors might be able to demonstrate that it really is notable - any thoughts? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - There appears to be sufficient mentions of the company in reliable news sources; should be sufficient to pass WP:GNG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per above, passes the notability guideline. Theking 17825 00:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.