Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayd
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Guardians of the Universe#Guardians known by name. Tone 14:27, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sayd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. There is no evidence that the fictional character meets the general notability guideline as a stand-alone subject since there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. More importantly, the character does not have reception or significance in reliable secondary sources, making any article about it a plot-only description of a fictional work that cannot be treated in an encyclopedic manner, and, thus, the subject is not suitable for a stand-alone article. A quick search engine test only shows unreliable sources, primary sources, tertiary sources that treat the character with regard to the plot exclusively or trivial mentions, implicating a lack of significant coverage as notability requires verifiable evidence. Jfgslo (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nom says it all. ClaretAsh (talk) 12:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Guardians of the Universe#Guardians known by name. Not all the alternatives to deletion have been exhausted. The current information can summarized and housed in its parent article while notability is established for a stand alone article.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Per TriiipleThreat. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 08:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.