Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sathya ganeshan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sathya ganeshan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, none found via Google (a blogger should be easy to find online), no indication of notability. Was prodded, prod removed by anon without improvement. Huon (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Fails WP:CREATIVE. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 19:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article is currently unsourced, and thus eligible for BLP-prod deletion in a week. I searched and can't find any reliable sources. In fact, I don't see any sourced related to a "famous comedic blogger" with this name at all, reliable or otherwise. The description is almost unimportant enough to qualify this for a speedy deletion; however, there's no real harm in letting this run for 7 days. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unable to find any coverage of this person. There are a few hits for an academic/software engineer in the UK by the same name but I don't think it's the same person. Hut 8.5 15:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was unable to find any reliable sources discussing this person. I noticed this deletion discussion when I noticed the article's creator attempting to blank this discussion, which seems to be a sign that no sources are forthcoming. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced article on a non-notable person. (a search using the Tamil name also turned up nothing)--Sodabottle (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. if sodabottle doesnt know him, nobody would. --CarTick (talk) 03:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.