Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samajik network
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Samajik network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company/website. No reliable sources cited or found through searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, Gale, HighBeam, or Tito Dutta's custom Indian English Newspapers Search. Worldbruce (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete First, Google returns 61 hits, none of them a reliable source, contradicting the puffery in the article about how this service is practically synonymous with "social network" throughout some portion of Asia, and demonstrating it to be drastically non-notable. Second, the most substantial source given in the article is exactly this puffery, about the popularity of this social network that the same article says hasn't gone live yet. Yeah, right. And, third, this article is purely promotional and, even if it were remotely notable, WP:TNT would apply. Largoplazo (talk) 17:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.