Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Foley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Foley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also any lack of significant media coverage means he fails WP:GNG. --Jimbo^[online] 23:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo^[online] 23:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. has not received significant media coverage therefore fails WP:GNG and also fails WP:NFOOTBALL as the Conference isn't fully professional. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've never heard of him, due to the lack of significant media coverage, therefore he shouldn't have an article. Cloudz 679 11:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.