Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Denby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 22:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Denby

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no real major reliable coverage. Many of the sources are straight from his channel, website, and even a tweet. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 22:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage from Forbes [1], Svenska Dagbladet [2], Ny Teknik [3], The Daily Telegraph [4], Popular Mechanics [5][6][7]. TompaDompa (talk) 23:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TompaDompa, but those just reference his videos. Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 01:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Anyway, here is a The New York Times article which covers Denby's podcast and here is a The Washington Post article authored by Denby. TompaDompa (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Conrad T. Pino (talk) 03:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is reasonable to assert that a writer who has directed documentaries viewed by millions meets the criteria for notability. This article is no stub, individuals with lesser reach have their own articles unchallenged.Tar-Elessar (talk) 05:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given that this article was only now put up for deletion despite being up for over 2 years, having a rich revision history, and consistently hundreds of views per day, it would seem to me that the only reason this article was nominated for deletion was because of Denby's connection to Nebula, which has also been nominated for deletion. Association between this article and another which has been nominated for deletion does not itself impact the notability of this article.Tar-Elessar (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per talk 2804:14C:658B:5025:D4FE:9C9B:DA23:23B2 (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: With reliable sources indicated above, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 09:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.