Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SageTea
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete Seems like an end-run around Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:SageTea, and fails WP:CSD#G11. Guy (Help!) 09:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- SageTea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was created for purely promotional purposes, in order to get around rejection at AfC (see Draft:SageTea). Speedy was declined by another editor. Bradv 04:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete obvious circumnavigation of AFC to get the company spam in a more prominent place. As the draft is failing at MfD which has a lower standard than AfD, this should definitely be deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.