Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STHIX
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- STHIX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company with no claim to notability and no third party sources. Tagged for improvement since November 2009. Prod declined by creator with invalid reason: "Owner of web site allows information to be printed on wikipedia". Hairhorn (talk) 01:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. I looked to see whether better information/referencing was available on the Swedish Wikipedia and found that a former article there was deleted on 12 July because "Innehållet förklarade inte ämnets relevans" (The content did not explain the relevance) which seems a good summary. AllyD (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.