Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQL PL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv🍁 16:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SQL PL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but doesn't have the coverage or significance to meet WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Grant Allen (2008). Beginning DB2: From Novice to Professional. Apress. p. 156. ISBN 9781430205487.
  2. ^ Paul Zikopoulos; George Baklarz; Roman B. Melnyk; Dirk Deroos (2003). DB2 Version 8: The Official Guide. Prentice Hall. pp. 239–240. ISBN 9780131401587.
  3. ^ George Baklarz; Bill Wong (2003). DB2 Universal Database V8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows Database Administration Certification Guide. Prentice Hall. pp. 845–846. ISBN 9780130463616.
  4. ^ Steve Sanyal; David Martineau; Kevin Gashyna; Michael Kyprianou (2003). DB2 Universal Database V8 Application Development Certification Guide. Prentice Hall. p. 136. ISBN 9780130463913.
SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - it’s a DB2 database subtopic, and the content is small enough to fold in. I see some hits in GBooks, mostly as part of that, e.g. phrasing DB2 SQL PL. The general GHITS and GNews seems too small to support a separate article. Cheers Markbassett (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.