Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCIPHONE N19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SCIPHONE N19

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems a non-notable mobile phone product. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not establish notability and, without that, a commercial product article such as this, is nothing more than spam. - Ahunt (talk) 18:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's nothing to establish notability here. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Clear spam: the only claim to notability is "ultra-lowprice", and the only link is to where to buy it from. Tagging as such. Pcap ping 21:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Not my choice, because I think it is pretty clear, but the article has already been turned down by an admin for CSD as spam. - Ahunt (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 21:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Was declined already, deferring to that. Article does nothing more than promote the device as a low-cost Android device. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not quite. This was speedily G11 deleted once today, reposted, G11 tagged again, speedy denied and taken to AfD the second time around. Pcap ping 23:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've declined the speedy again. But it needs to be deleted anyway. This way, if we delete it through the AFD and it's recreated again, we can delete it on sight as G4. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I speedied the first iteration, and clearly agree with non-notable (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep,I found this android model makes its way as an alternative bargin phone.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 04:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ILIKEIT. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 16:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.