Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S+core

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to HyperScan. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

S+core

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's topic, an architecture called S+core and processors based on it, does not appear to meet the general notability guideline. I could not find any significant coverage of the topic in reliable sources on Google. Of the 7 references in the article at the time of nomination:

#1is a primary source (the company website)
#2 is an incidental mention of S+core in some materials related to Linux kernel development, eg. notes written by SW developers for SW developers
#3 is an incidental mention of S+core in a news article about the Linux kernel
#4 is a blog, which isn't a reliable source per WP:BLOGS
#5 is an article about a HP calculator tear down that has an incidental mention of an unrelated Sunplus product
#6 is a primary source (a press release) about Sunplus, not S+core
#7 is a blog, see #4

99Electrons (talk) 06:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to HyperScan. Seems to be only "major" product using this architecture and one simple sentence about S+core can be added to the Hardware specifications section. Pavlor (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to HyperScan per Pavlor's points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.