Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russ Tobin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Russ Tobin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Poorly sourced. None of the books which featured the character are notable enough to have articles on Wikipedia. RoCo^(talk) 15:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A seemingly unnotable fictional character. Sources regarding the character are few and far in between, and they are nothing more than listings of a few of the books the character appeared in. Admittedly, the majority of the books the character appeared in are far older than the internet, thus there may have been some reliable sources back in the day that have never been brought online, but unless some of those are brought to light, this character does not pass the GNG. On a side note, it may be worth it to look over the Wikipedia article on the author for notability as well, as during my search for sources on the character, I found just as few reliable sources discussing his creator. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator's comment. Does not appear to have enough coverage for a separate article. Aoba47 (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.