Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runforthecube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 15:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Runforthecube

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not appear to be significant coverage in reliable independent sources about this YouTuber who is thus non-notable. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is referenced overwhelmingly to either his own or other people's YouTube videos, which are not valid or reliable support for notability, while the three references that actually qualify as reliable sources include a Q&A interview in which he's speaking about himself, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of something else — so there's only one source ("Learn how to pronounce Guillaume Latendresse terribly") that's actually contributing anything at all toward demonstrating his notability, which is not enough all by itself. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.