Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal progress
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy - A5. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Royal progress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A page that has never been more than a definition and has been transwikied to the Wikitionary, but had it's prod objected to for no reason whatsoever by an anon IP. Caerwine Caer’s whines 02:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; It's been transwikied and is just a dicdef. <3 bunny —Preceding comment was added at 02:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dicdef. Personally, I don't see how it could be made an article; I'll watch for improvement over the next 5 days. JJL (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A5, page has been transwikied and author info recorded. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.