Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotolliptic Mechanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rotolliptic Mechanism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTESSAY. Completely unsourced originial research with no Google results. By the way those are interesting thoughts, but unfortunately Wikipedia isn't appropriate place for publishing new researches/inventions. I advise some patent company. Alex^{discussion ★} 02:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia doesn't publish original research. This reminds me of a simplified Wankel engine, so if I am right, it is not entirely original, but it definitely isn't notable at this time. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Inventor has not provided any sources... Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 04:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.