Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Room 21three

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Harr o5 09:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added {{deleted}} as well. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Room 21three

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Re-re-re-re-created speedy deleted room, ensuring conensus for last delete-- — xaosflux ^Talk 06:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE, I've already speedily deleted this article 3 times, yet the article creator keeps recreating it. I suggest a block. --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect, as has already been done with Room 213; consider a block. bikeable (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Truly Genius article. I saw a documentary on WHYY PBS out of Philly on this remarkable living arrangement. The comparisons to Haight-Ashbury were particularly poignant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.175.127.29 (talk • contribs)
Comment This is a film project put on by our film production company, these are the basic premises of a new modern/independent film we are making. It is just about college life/discussions in the modern era. It's a project for our school, we thought the ideas/rhetoric of common college students would be educational and deserved to be up on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thursday615 (talk • contribs)
Comment A rising success where many others have failed. Reminds me of the years of planning I went through in college to finish a similar project. Great to have for future research.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.123.190 (talk • contribs)
Delete Joke article? --KJ 07:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upon creating Wikipedia in 1992, I expected it to become a bulwark of academic discussion and a key point on the web for democractic dissemination of ideas. That being said, I think these boys' article might just be crazy enough to work. Let's give them a shot [User: Creator of Wikipedia] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.175.127.29 (talk • contribs)

Speedy delete: G4 and protect as recreation of deleted material. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect per Kinu. --Khoikhoi 08:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect recreation of deleted nonsense. Weregerbil 09:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.