Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RooTooth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RooTooth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, simply not notable. I considered tagging this as db-spam, but in any case it lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 06:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, try WP:PROD first for deleting articles that people are unlikely to care about. -- intgr [talk] 16:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, I will do as I please and take action as I see fit. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 15:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable advertisement. All coverage is in passing, mainly reviews of Roomba with a one-sentence mention. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 07:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.