Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Entwistle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be NN vanity. Google for: Results 1 - 10 of about 384 for "Ron Entwistle" none of which seem to backup the assertions in the article, and Results 1 - 10 of about 27 for "Ron Entwistle" spider. most of which are wiki or wiki mirrors. Wikibofh(talk) 17:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it's not vanity. The question now is notability and verifiability. And Google is actually worthless for such things. Ste4k 21:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Really, Google is worthless for notability? What an interesting opinion. Only edits by a single user, looks like vanity. Regardless, it appears to fail all 3. Wikibofh(talk) 00:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Google is worthless as an indicator of notability based on number of hits a person/subject generates on a search (at least in my opinion)... it's great for actually finding sources (or lack of sources as the case may be) though.--Isotope23 16:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Really, Google is worthless for notability? What an interesting opinion. Only edits by a single user, looks like vanity. Regardless, it appears to fail all 3. Wikibofh(talk) 00:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree with the above comment, I am going to place a notability tag on this article. The information in it needs to be backed up. It says he has been involved with many bands but no names of these bands - they could have all been in his mates garage for example. I had a look on google too and didn't find much. If notabiity isn't established I say Delete. Lynnathon 13:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ian Manka Talk to me! 05:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if notability is not established with reliable sources. TomTheHand 13:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per TomTheHand. Everything here is on Ron Entwistle's MySpace site, but I can't find any external WP:RS to back these claims up... which seems rather odd. If it gets sourced though I would reconsider.--Isotope23 16:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per TomtheHand Alphachimp talk 19:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.