Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Aggarwal
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rohit Aggarwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the amazingly promotional tone of the biography, there doesn't seem to be sufficient notability attached. Taroaldo ✉ 05:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The references relate to the firm not the subject, who gets passing mention/quotation in some of them. No evidence of the subject having individual biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with AllyD here. There already is an article Koenig Solutions for the IT training institute. I do not see that the owner Rohit Aggarwal is inherently notable. (Note also --- The sole contribution of the user is to create Koenig Solutions and Rohit Aggarwal. The same references are quoted in both and a promotional tone is used.) Thanks, Anand (talk page) 12:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.