Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocrail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Model train control systems. - KrakatoaKatie 01:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rocrail

Unreferenced. Fails the general notability guideline. May qualify for CSD A7 as it does not indicate why the subject is important or significant. McWomble (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial independent coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sounds interesting but no reliable sources available to establish WP:N, 1. --J^mundo 01:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge into Model train control systems. Topic is not super notable in its own right, but there is a bit much material to merge so I could go either way. Definitely deserves to be covered somewhere though. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Model train control systems. I couldn't find sources proving it's notable enough for its own article, but we can cover it in another article. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.