Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roboticizer (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 19:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Roboticizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was prodded for a lack of notability per WP:N. The prod tag was removed, and so the article comes to AFD. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 03:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cruft with no real world relevance; throw in some WP:OR and you have yourself one for the junk heap. Just don't let it get roboticized. D: JuJube (talk) 03:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nonsensical article with zero sources which suggests it is not WP:N It may also be WP:OR. Artene50 (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable element of fiction, and filled with WP:OR. It is also unsourced, and does not yield many google hits, either. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 05:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N (and WP:FICT etc). Is essentially just an article about plot (WP:NOT#PLOT) and the lack of sources providing real world info means that's not going to change. Bridies (talk) 09:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete What everyone else said. Dylanlip (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.