Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Quigg (developer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Quigg (developer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO as lacking sufficient reliable sources and significant coverage to establish notability. Several gSearches conducted per WP:BEFORE failed to locate sources. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only mentions, not enough in-depth coverage. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - his business bankruptcy was pretty large. Bearian (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of the coverage relating to his bankruptcy is not in-depth enough to satisfy WP:BIO, and none of the publication sources are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia article. Newslinger (talk) 14:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.