Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse trading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse trading

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like WP:NEO or even WP:HOAX. Unverifiable and the one mention from 1973 is a court case, which is in my opinion a coincidence when discussion a similar issue. The author Juxo (talk · contribs) had previously created? the now deleted Reverse financial instrument article, which appears to be unverifiable as well. The undeletion request was unsuccessful. The new article has almost the same content. I enquired in Economics WikiProject (Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Economics#Unverifiable_article_Reverse_trading), and so far no one definitely confirmed this concept as real. No sources found, except numerous WP mirrors. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not seem to be a notable concept, at least under that name. Jaque Hammer (talk) 10:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No source has been found (and as I know from #wikipedia, the author has been looking for quite a while). And as I've told him all along, I think it's redundant with other articles like shorting. --Gwern (contribs) 18:04 20 January 2011 (GMT)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.