Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse breathing (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse breathing

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient on-point (specifically WP:MEDRS) sources to establish notability for a standalone article. Brief mention may be due elsewhere (Qigong?) Bon courage (talk) 06:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Martial arts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. 5Q5|^✉ 11:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Currently, not seeing notability established for this. Sources are not that good either. Needs more for stand alone article than what is currently there. Ramos1990 (talk) 07:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:20, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per comments above, poorly referenced, low quality sourcing -in bubble? sourcing. -Roxy the dog 07:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.