Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse Circulation Drilling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion. G12 copyright infringement. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse Circulation Drilling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or move to Drilling. Abbottonian (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to state that this article could be a part of overall drilling - but would be better as a subsection. The methodology and applications differ significantly enough to have a separate page. Reverse circulation drilling is utilized when environmental concerns are high in the creation of new foundations and it is a very specialized technique. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanched (talk • contribs) 15:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's already a longer discussion of the technique at Drilling rig#Reverse circulation (RC) drilling. That section doesn't have any in line sources either, but quick GBooks and GScholar searches suggests that there's plenty of reliable sources out there that could be used to verify the content. As an editorial matter I suggest it would be better to improve the existing content at drilling rig and defer creation of a separate article until it's apparent that there's not enough room in the broader article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.