Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reportlinker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reportlinker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:ORGDEPTH. The only news articles I could find were the result of press releases. - MrX 23:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are official websites: - SIIA: 2012 Codie Awards pages - Deloitte: Technology Fast 500 EMEA rankings pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felize2013 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, official web sites mean very little when determining reliable sources for notability. What we need are news articles, magazine articles, books, academic journals and similar independent, reliable sources. - MrX 14:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can see that they are prolific when it comes to issuing press releases. I was unable to find any independent coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash [talk] 05:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.