Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renderosity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renderosity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by a new user named "Renderosity". Tagged since 2010 as lacking sources. Despite a flurry of recent edits, not one reliable source providing significant coverage of the subject has been brought forward. Best effort has been an NYT article which merely mentions (ie not "significant coverage") that the site exists and a gallery book "Digital Art for the 21st Century" published by the Editor-in-Chief of Renderosity Magazine (ie not "Independent of the subject"). No sign or indication of notability. GDallimore (Talk) 16:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There does not appear to be any significant sources independent of the subject to verify notability. Most coverage appears to be press release-generated news which is not sufficient. freshacconci talktalk 17:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.