Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Referencecenter.com (encyclopedia)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Referencecenter.com (encyclopedia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable new website without significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources so failing WP:NOTE. Delete. Drawn Some (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This article has been updated and sourced to show its long standing history and connection to Research and Learn which launched in 1998Swknowles (talk) 02:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC) — Swknowles (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- The current sources are from AOL (the owners) and the website itself. The Cnet source doesn't actually refer to the subject in question. Can you find any specific and independent coverage of the subject in a reliable source? They're the sort of things that prove an article is really worth keeping. Thanks! Greg Tyler (t • c) 22:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note. Article has been moved to Reference Center. 'Cos I'm mad like that. Greg Tyler (t • c) 22:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a premature article about non-notable website. Alexius08 (talk) 23:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not yet sufficiently notable. No evidence of non-trivial coverage of subject by multiple, reliable, third-party published sources. — Satori Son 15:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article has no 3rd-party references that are actually about this site. I searched Gnews for Referencecenter.com and had no hits. There's no indication that this article meets WP:WEB. -- Atamachat 16:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Kingturtle (talk) 00:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice against recreation once notability can be established. Sam Barsoom 21:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.