Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redpine Signals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redpine Signals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's only source is a company profile, and I wasn't able to find better sources with my own search. Does this company meet Wikipedia's notability criteria that anyone else can see? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My search revealed equally sparse results, and none reliable; corporate listings, social media, press releases. There is no assertion of notability and I found none. Ubelowme U Me 21:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σσς. 02:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only sources I could find at Google News Archive are press releases. Does not seem to have received any independent coverage as required. --MelanieN (talk) 14:41, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per duhLuciferWildCat (talk) 21:49, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.