Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Swan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red Swan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough topics to disambiguate; was redirected to Green bean as red swan beans are apparently a cultivar thereof but currently no mention is made of them in the article. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I've added a bunch of new entries, mostly borderline cases. In various articles there are mentions of Red Swan Studios and of Red Swan Ventures, but I haven't included them. – Uanfala 10:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on Uanfala's great work, this was a useless page before. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist, do all these entries (meeting MOS:DABMENTION) convince you to withdraw the nomination now? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, Uanfala (talk · contribs). I believe that will work. Withdrawal is the best course of action now. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.