Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recursion
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Redirecting is the best idea I've ever heard of in this case 
(aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor Talk 01:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Recursion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's best to have this redirected to recursion. – The Grid (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete this deletion discussion to complete the circle. Gimubrc (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Recursion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to recursion per Bilorv. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect this article to Uranus and have the Uranus redirect here to create a loop. --KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.