Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reclaimer Comic
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reclaimer Comic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I originally WP:PRODded this, but realized that it was ineligible for PROD because it had been undeleted. The only possible claim of significance is being mentioned in Bungie's developer blog. However, the coverage is limited to very short blurbs, such as "The latest episode of Reclaimer is up. All the questions you've had about the series have now been answered." which doesn't count as non-trivial coverage. A Google search excluding forums, blogs, and wiki turns up about 21 unique hits, none of which appear to be reliable sources. No hits in Google News, Books, or Scholar. A less restricted search separating Reclaimer and Comic still fails to find non-trivial reliable coverage. I also can't find any indication that this webcomic has won an award. Therefore, this work seems to fail our guideline of notability for web content. — TKD::{talk} 11:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While obviously verifiable, absolutely no indication of sufficient real-world notability to warrant an article. Orbital Delegate (talk) 12:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—no evidence of real-world notability/out-of-universe information. — Deckiller 21:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.