Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebuildingsociety.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 13:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rebuildingsociety.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a crowdsourcing website. Little to no coverage or third-party mentions, except the local ones already provided as references which are essentially routine. No indication that this company meets WP:CORP. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP. Also, almost certainly a COI/SPAM issue given the tone and article history. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP. The subject is not notable in reliable sources to indicate significant coverage, and there is also a conflict of interest. TBrandley (what's up) 22:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- It all looks very spammy to me. Without some evidence of size or something else to induicate significance, I do not see how we can keep this. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.