Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReDim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any merge proposals should be made on the talk pages of the respective articles. SarahStierch (talk) 05:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ReDim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Visual Basic command. Could be merged into the VB article, but then that's not a reference manual. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Array data type#Language support, either under the Resizing subheading or a new heading (I'm not totally sure whether computer scientists would argue this is different to resizing an array, which is normally dynamic and automatic without having to be done explicitly). I certainly don't think this keyword needs its own article, but the array data type article describes how arrays are used in different languages. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 01:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:NOTMANUAL ~KvnG 18:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 03:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It would probably worth mentioning the ReDim statement in the article about BASIC, however the article makes little sense on it's own. --Salimfadhley (talk) 23:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.