Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rdist
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Rdist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article creator contested PROD. I proded it as an apparently non-notable computer command. It was deproded, and I intended to do a bit more digging later, but it was further PRODed by PamD for being a dictionary definition style entry. I think both concerns are valid, so bring it to AfD. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete What. Individual Linux commands get articles now? And then all there is to say is a dictionary definition? Delete on both counts.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.