Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RateItAll (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RateItAll

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite an impressive list of references, they appear to be all either press releases from the company, or mentions in passing (e.g. in a list of similar websites); does not meet WP:WEB -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: last AfD was in 2007. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — subject notable in the industry, traffic amount data is significant (even if showing a negative growth). Sources in indipendent industry-related media available (summary at CrunchBase). Mentions available even on Google Scholar. The most recent reference by a reliable source i found is an article by VentureBeat. — Zhernovoi (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should point out that CrunchBase is "CrunchBase is the free directory of technology companies, people, and investors that anyone can edit." (http://www.crunchbase.com/about). The VentureBeat article looks to me like a reliable source (it's editors are professionals, rather than just anyone!) - but the other references in the article were press releases or mentions-in-passing, as I noted on my nomination. I'm still not convinced that significant coverage is there. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The CrunchBase Profile reference can be used to sum up mentions of the subject — it contains boxes with TechCrunch and Techmeme articles covering RateItAll. — Zhernovoi (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.