Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rand cam engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rand cam engine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an advertisement. Only citations are the company's website, a patent, and some sort of document or media as a citation for a related technology. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article subject fails WP:PRODUCT. Sources are trivial and or fail WP:RS A Google search yielded quite a lot of hits but no RS sources. Oddly, a lot of non RS sources seem to connect this product in some way with the Jehovah's Witness movement. I didn't delve though once the source was ruled out for our purposes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Coverage in independent, reliable sources is lacking. TheBlueCanoe 03:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.