Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon solano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon Solano

Fails Notability. A unnotable character and the source is not reliable. SkyWalker (talk) 07:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no reason to have a separate article on this character especially with the lack of sources. Redirect Ramon Solano (note proper capitalization) to the game article. -- Mgm|^(talk) 09:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
merge as I understand it, its a fairly notable game,and he is the principal character. Normally I would therefore support keeping the article, but in this case thee isn't enough material of any sort to support two articles. DGG (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game is notable but not the character it should not be merged and must be deleted. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh…this article has already been redirected somewhere else. Explanation, anyone? MuZemike (talk) 05:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the history. The author need to be warned. It is a unwarranted move. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable fictional character with no significant coverage in reliable third party sources. RMHED (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Common or garden video game antagonists #12,391: that guy from Mercenaries 2. Non-notable non-entity whose role is amply described in Mercenaries 2: World in Flames#Plot. Someone another 18:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom the character is not notable or reported on by any third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.