Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Hashish (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 04:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Hashish

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as a part of new article curation/review. No indication of wp:notability. Of 29 references, almost all were links to papers and posts that he wrote or to his company's website. The only independent coverage is current ref #4 which has a few paragraphs combined on him and his company. Article reads like a combined resume and advertisement for his company. Some concern that it was written by a wiki-experienced editor but has only 18 lifetime edits under that user name. Edit #1 was a complete article. Article was previously deleted, and then rejected at AFC based on wp:notability. If deleted, possibly should be salted. ? North8000 (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nominator. Plenty of refs provided but all together not what we’d look for to pass GNG. Mccapra (talk) 03:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there's coverage all right - but it's very shallow in way of passing mentions, duplicate citations, and sources controlled by the subject. Please ping me if you find some better refs. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.