Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Hashish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Hashish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. The only Google News results for him are the blog entries he written himself. JDDJS (talk) 02:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination, article is basically a resume. Subject simply does not meet WP:GNG. {MordeKyle} ☢ 02:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Screams WP:PAID. Nothing to show ANYBIO. Nowhere near NAUTHOR or NPROF. John from Idegon (talk) 02:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He's written some articles but I'm not seeing the multiple independent sources necessary to pass WP:ACADEMIC or WP:BIO. The article seems to be a bit on the puff piece side, with references to anything that has mentioned his name. There are lots of references, but many of them are not worth anything. For instance, the ref https://www.yelp.com/biz/urban-med-los-angeles for his being the Director of Rehabilitation Medicine at UrbanMed is nothing but some gushing blog postings, which do not mention his position. (I don't doubt the position, but the ref does not verify it, and is just non-reliable puffery.) The info box states that he is known for being the founder of the National Biomechanics Institute. Impressive sounding name, but it appears to simply be his business, which was incorporated just 7 months ago (in Delaware). It claims to be "the preeminent biomechanics consulting firm in the United States" but we need a bit more than just his company website to back that up. The only sources I can find for this company are its physical and online presence, job postings, and mentions of it in Hashish's various bios. Meters (talk) 03:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I want a source for Hashish participated in more than 100 human cadaver dissections OR IT NEVER HAPPENED! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Very low citations for his field and no other evidence that he meets WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. I do find it surprising that a purportedly new editor would create an (almost) perfectly formed article like this and have asked the creator about a conflict of interest. Joe Roe (talk) 11:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.