Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio navigation aid
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Radio navigation. — Jake Wartenberg 01:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Radio navigation aid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another editor, Cuddlyable3 (talk • contribs • count), states that the article is a hoax. Eastmain (talk) 01:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 01:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Perhaps a redirect to Radio navigation might be better. -- Eastmain (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Xe's quite right. The current content is complete bunkum. A speedy stubbing would have been in order were it not for the fact that we have the subject covered in radio navigation. The reason for this article's existence appears to be some poor linking choices in a few articles (Special:Whatlinkshere/Radio navigation aid), linking text as "radio navigation aid" rather than as "radio navigation aid". Uncle G (talk) 01:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect selective merge and redirect to Radio navigation RadioFan (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.