Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel C. Weingarten
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Rachel C. Weingarten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionable notability and this article reads as a promotional piece. Subverted (talk • contribs) 01:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- delete - apart from the completely promotional nature of the article, a basic WP:BEFORE finds lots by her in RSes but nothing at all about her. RSes have passing mentions of her or promotional outreach from her. No evidence of notability, nothing to base a BLP on - David Gerard (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: this article appears to have been edited by numerous SPAs: Kylegtk (talk · contribs), who wrote the bulk of this article, Lavenderlass (talk · contribs), Hooshlevesh (talk · contribs), Delfeo (talk · contribs), Kyledix (talk · contribs), Pettyfourz (talk · contribs), Donutsina (talk · contribs), BasilBiscuitBaker (talk · contribs), Ferzach (talk · contribs). There's a possibility that this is paid editing (or an editor who registers, edits, then forgets his/her password). Mindmatrix 16:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. -- Dane2007 talk 20:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.