Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaboPlus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rabobank. MBisanz talk 19:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- RaboPlus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Similar arguments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UBank. RaboPlus is merely a marketing arm of Rabobank - content should be left there and this be a redirect. There is nothing especially notable (at this time) about RaboPlus. Ext links are generally self-references. Per WP:PRODUCT, "information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself" Moondyne 12:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect then. F (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per nom and response SatuSuro 12:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect, but technically, an AfD is not the right type of discussion for this.--Boffob (talk) 14:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect and as per Boffob this wasn't the right type of discussion - why not use the {{merge}} tags? --Matilda talk 00:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There nothing of substance to merge. –Moondyne 11:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. ING Direct was a "keep" and is itself "ING Direct is a marketing name for a branchless direct bank...". let's be consistent here ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizzzzman (talk • contribs) 10:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) — Wizzzzman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- delete then redirect nothing of substance to merge Gnangarra 00:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.