Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R Plus
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to R+. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- R Plus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disambiguation page does not link to any valid articles (anymore). +mt 20:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 1. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Mwtoews, why not just redirect to R+? – Uanfala (talk) 13:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Just so... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Uanfala: that's a good speedy resolution. +mt 22:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to R+. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.