Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R E Romero-Probst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

R E Romero-Probst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:NSPORT, WP:AUTHOR, WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; edit history indicates either WP:Autobiography or WP:Conflict of interest. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem encyclopedic...Modernist (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:N not fulfilled by the sources provided. Ty 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{555randolph (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.