Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTL Games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- RTL Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability, appears to be a company that doesn't meet WP:CORP. CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. --MaNeMeBasat (talk) 07:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The business and its founder get non-trivial RS coverage for making a hot-selling product.(BBC, Management Today, SA Good News and more - Google News search) • Gene93k (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't seem to meet the non-trivial media coverage guidelines either. A handful of bit pieces seems pretty slim. The company should have a Wikipedia page if it's already notable, but it just doesn't seem to be there yet. WP isn't a PR tool. I didn't speedy it under A7 because I'm not 100%, but I look forward to hearing what the closing admin decides. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 18:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP. A game company with a single game is generally not-notable. The sliver of notability here seems to be that she was told her idea was rubbish on TV but she went ahead and did it anyway. Cool, but that's just not enough. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - of the links provide above, only the BBC News article is of interest, the remainder being press releases. Further coverage like that may swing a keep from me, although perhaps under an alternate title depending on the focus of the coverage. Marasmusine (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.