Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTInation
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge/redirect. I merged it pretty much intact, may need some cleanup. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- RTInation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable online system, sources insufficient to demonstrate notabilty. ukexpat (talk) 16:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm loathe to delete this, as it's another WP:IEP article. Please read the background over there and take into account the deadlines and problems of that project before acting hastily. If it's already on the IEP cleanup lists, it's unlikely to be overlooked. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If I am understanding the article, this apparently has to do with a right to information procedure or law in India. The article itself is about some sort of online form to submit requests under that law.
As far as I can tell we have no article about that Indian law or department.The underlying law is also fairly self evidently worthy of a standalone article. If we had one, this would have an obvious merger target. As it stands now it's an oddly promotional piece that's seriously lacking in context. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Spoke too soon. Smerge and/or redirect to Right to Information Act, 2005. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for finding that. Clear merge. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.