Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPGamer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RPGamer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any sources that would back up its notability here. The sources used in the article is from GameFAQs, Alexa and its own website. GamerPro64 16:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete as it stands, unless we get RSes actually about the site - David Gerard (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried a few simple searches, but they mostly just turned up trivial mentions, such as "according to rpgamer, the game will be released next week" or whatever. That's good for establishing reliability, but it can't establish notability. I tried a few more restrictive searches to find hits about the site's history, but the best I could find was this one-sentence mention. I don't think there's significant coverage of the site itself. Too bad; I'd prefer we had articles on reliable sources cited on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lack of secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.